4/7/2023 0 Comments Swifty banned 2016![]() ![]() "The panel has clearly upheld our findings that the Russian authorities brazenly and illegally manipulated the Moscow laboratory data in an effort to cover up an institutionalised doping scheme. "We left no stone unturned in investigating this very complex matter and in presenting our case before Cas," said Wada president Witold Banka. An important decision for clean sport - WadaĪfter the ruling was announced, Wada said it was pleased to have "won this landmark case", adding it was important for "clean sport across the world". Russia has been banned from competing as a nation in athletics since 2015. The Russian national anthem cannot be played or sung at any official venue, while flags cannot be displayed either.Ī total of 168 Russian athletes competed under a neutral flag at the 2018 Winter Olympics in Pyeongchang. If their kit displays the name 'Russia' - written in any language - it cannot be more prominent than the words 'neutral athlete' which must be in English. They can wear a kit which contains Russian colours, but it cannot bear the Russian flag or any national symbol. Russian athletes who can prove they are untainted by the doping scandal will be able to compete under a neutral flag. Will there be no sign of Russia at these events? When Wada announced its sanction last December, Russian prime minister Dmitry Medvedev said the ban was part of "chronic anti-Russian hysteria". Russia has also been prevented from hosting international events during the same period. "It has considered matters of proportionality and, in particular, the need to effect cultural change and encourage the next generation of Russian athletes to participate in clean international sport." "The panel has imposed consequences to reflect the nature and seriousness of the non-compliance and to ensure that the integrity of sport against the scourge of doping is maintained," said Cas, which announced the ruling on Thursday. Russia had been told to hand over data to Wada as a condition of its controversial reinstatement in 2018 after a three-year suspension for its vast state-sponsored doping scandal. Wada declared Russia's Anti Doping Agency (Rusada) non-compliant for manipulating laboratory data handed over to investigators in January 2019. Russia will be allowed to play at next year's delayed Euro 2020 tournament because European football's governing body Uefa is not defined as a "major event organisation" with regards to rulings on anti-doping breaches. The governing body has previously said a maximum of 10 Russian track and field athletes will be allowed to compete under a neutral flag at the Tokyo Games, which were postponed to July 2021 because of the coronavirus pandemic. World Athletics said it will decide in March 2021 whether to allow Russian athletes who can prove they are clean to compete as neutral athletes in international athletics competitions. The ban will now run until 16 December 2022, meaning Russia is also banned from competing at the Winter Olympics in Beijing in February. Take into account guard statements inside loops, for example.Russia was initially given a four-year ban by the World Anti-Doping Agency.Ĭas said the reduction of the ban should not be seen "as any validation" of Russia's conduct. Idea-was that the 'obvious' implicit behavior becomes non-obvious when you ![]() The gist of it-or at least one of the compelling arguments against the Have easy access to the archives at the moment so I can't provide a I believe this has already been proposed on the list in the past. On Thu, at 9:46 AM, Xiaodi Wu via swift-evolution wrote: Or if the function returns an optional type, I'll simply return nil if guard fails.Ĭan we improve on the general fallback case? Could we simply say:Īnd have that imply "else // only executes theĬlosure if self is not nil. I feel that `guard` could be a little more Swifty and would like to start a conversation concerning it.įor example, I often have a function whose job depends on an optional having a value, and so I guard-let at the start and return if the guard fails. I agree the nil fallback case is a common one, but the loss of readability and decreased understanding of control flow here makes me think special-casing this isn't all it's cracked up to be.Ġ 22:40、Tighe Racicot via swift-evolution のメッセージ: ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |